Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Aull
as 19-6796
Defendant / Appellee:
T. ESTERLINE, BECKETT, JR., JAMES PARRISH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-6528
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Aull v. FMS, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Robert Aull
Defendant:
FMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Garrett et al v Waupaca Foundry
as 1:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell McCarthy, Jason Stallings, Thomas Marshall and others
Defendant:
Waupaca Foundry Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garrett v. Aull et al
as 0:2018cv01418
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Aull, Beckett, Jr., T. Esterline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Aull et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03266
Plaintiff:
Deanna M. Aull and James E. Aull
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
William P Aull v. NBS Default Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01951
Plaintiff:
William P. Aull
Defendant:
Does, NBS Default Services, LLC and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Collier v. Beckett et al
as 5:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Laquan Demetrius Collier
Defendant:
C Beckett, Lt Aull and Ms Olds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagle Market Makers Inc. et al v. Tagler et al
as 1:2014cv08096
Plaintiff:
Eagle Market Makers , James Aull and Ronald Manaster
Defendant:
Joseph Tagler , Katelyn Tagler , Walter Dickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
