Cases 21 - 30 of 51
JORDAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2019cv00190
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Craig Jordan v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 19-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG ANTHONY JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY LANIGAN, Commissioner N.J. Department of Corrections and JAMES T. PLOUSIS, Chairman / Director N.J. State Parole Board
Jordan v. USA
as 2:2018cv01930
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jordan v. Knox County Detention Facility
as 3:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jordan
Defendant:
Knox County Detention Facility, Jimmy Jones, Chief Tarley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02539
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY JORDAN
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennifer Oh, et al v. Scram of California, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05588
Defendant:
Advantage Sentencing Alternative Programs, Inc.,, Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc.,, Court Programs of North Florida, L.LC., and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Bailey, Christina Bohnstedt, Toriahna Bonds and others
Jordan v. Knox County Detention Facility
as 3:2017mc00019
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jordan
Defendant:
Knox County Detention Facility
Barnes v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jordan Barnes
Defendant:
Todd Brown, Columbia County Georgia, Donna Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2017cv02015
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ANTHONY JORDAN
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN and JAMES T. PLOUSIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Jordan v. NCI Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01701
Defendant:
NCI Group, Inc, NCI Group, Inc. and Does 1-50, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Jordan and Anthony Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
