Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Yates v. Warren et al
as 1:2021cv03808
Plaintiff:
Arshade Jayquane Yates
Defendant:
Sheriff Neil Warren, Col. David Sanders, Major Michael L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Wood v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 2:2021cv01572
Plaintiff:
Arshad Wood
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, Brett Babbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. Best et al
as 1:2021cv07171
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieves
Defendant:
Miriam R. Best, Christopher Rivet, Brandon Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Nazir et al
as 8:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Arshad Nazir
Garnishee:
Glens Falls National Bank & Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Cleveland et al v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.
as 3:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Dr. Karen Oegema, Frank Furnari, Dr. Richard Kolodner and others
Defendant:
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arshad v. 2090 Gas Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv02654
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Arshad
Defendant:
Harry Singh and 2090 Gas Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yates v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00456
Defendant:
Maj. Williams, Maj. Bains and D/S Helton, et al.,
Plaintiff:
Arshade Jayquane Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Willard Fuller Jr. v. Mona Houston et al
as 5:2021cv00127
Defendant:
R. Amis, Muhammad Arshad Farooq, L. Kaz and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Willard Fuller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strange v. Pluton Technologies Private Limited et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Mohammad Arshad Khan, Pluton Technologies Private Limited and KZK Company. LLC
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Khan v. Capra
as 20-4133
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Michael Capra
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arshad Khan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
