Cases 21 - 30 of 229
Law v. Pierce County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2023cv05085
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Law
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Sr, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
ELMORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EDWARD ELMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Warden of USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Moore
Respondent:
Warden of USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
United States of America v. Newman et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Clayton Newman, Jr., Brian Edward Newman, Tonya Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
USA v. Edwards
as 22-40828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brian Edwards
Reynolds v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00423
Petitioner:
Brian Reynolds and Brian Edward Reynolds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GLICK v. CORBIN et al
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EDWARD GLICK
Defendant:
L J CORBIN and J C LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
