Cases 21 - 30 of 42
SWEARINGEN et al v. LENARD et al
as 4:2017cv00058
Defendant:
DONNA KAY LENARD and ROBERT LENARD, JR.
Plaintiff:
BERNIE SMITH, TARA SMITH and BONNIE SMITH SWEARINGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01869
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swanagan v. Seburn et al
as 1:2014cv01909
Plaintiff:
Leonard G. Swanagan
Defendant:
Taron Seburn, Administration of Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Wayne Gurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15535
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Ashtabula County et al
as 1:2014cv00170
Defendant:
Ashtabula County, William Johnson, Terry Moisio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crites v. Ashtbula County et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lisa Crites
Defendant:
Ashtabula County, William Johnson, Terry Moisio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12094
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as MA/1:13-cv-12094
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20793
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20793
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
