Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Kelley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-18718
Plaintiff:
Catharine C. Kelley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Kelley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18718
Plaintiff:
Catharine C. Kelley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avilez v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Elpidio B. Avilez
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Crystal A. Reyes and Jason C. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Ledford v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Ashley Cameron-Ledford
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Janet Bozarth, Hillary Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Estes et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Joel C. Kelley
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley et al v. Acadia Broadcast Partners Inc
as 6:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kelly C Kelley , Jerry Lynn Kelley , Matthew J Kelley and others
Defendant:
Acadia Broadcast Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kelley v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv02654
Plaintiff:
Patrick C Kelley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelley v. Estes et al
as 5:2012cv03485
Petitioner:
Joel C Kelley
Respondent:
Floyd Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jane C. Kelley v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insu
as 12-2888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE C. KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Kelley v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
as 1:2012cv21162
Plaintiff:
Scott C. Kelley
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
