Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Walter Dodd, Jr. v. Jerry Simmons, et al
as 13-6505
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER EARL DODD, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
JERRY SIMMONS, CHARLES PIERCE, Officer and CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Westley v. Alberto et al
as 0:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
John D. Westley
Defendant:
Jose L. Alberto, RE/MAX, LLC, Verona Condominium Association Inc. and others
Dodd v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Dodd, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Simmons, Charles Pierce and City of Centerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Manuel et al v. R-Vision, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07880
Plaintiff:
Johnny Manuel , Rose Manuel , Dorothy Thompson and others
Defendant:
R-Vision, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Huynh et al v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ngo Huynh, All Plaintiffs, Bruce Glanemann and others
Defendant:
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., Fleetwood Canada, Ltd., Fleetwood Homes of North Carolina, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02199
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Hayes et al
as 4:2007cv01409
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Pierce
Respondent:
James Hayes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
