Cases 21 - 30 of 5,300
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 24-1692
Petitioner:
FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
CHESTER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL CHESTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Chester v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 9:2024cv00070
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. and Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Xavier Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Newberry v. Cofty et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry and Flip
Defendant:
Patricia M. Cofty, Michael J. Prodan, Steve E. Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MORGAN
Defendant:
OFFICER ALEJANDRO ORTIZ, CORPORAL JARED DAVIS and COATESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
