Cases 21 - 30 of 7,023
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilkins v. Clifford, et al.
as 2:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Robert Wilkins
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Matthew Clifford, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and Steve Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fantel, Jr. v. WARM Center et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
WARM Center and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chinault v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chinault
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Davis (PS) v. Storey et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis
Defendant:
Scott Storey, Jessica J. Radke, Todd Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Gayton v. State
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Gayton
Defendant:
State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
