Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,371
Dale McQuistonIn re: Dale McQuiston
as 24-5736
Petitioner: In re: DALE CONRAD MCQUISTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Deleon v. Vogelweede et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Defendant: Julie Marie Brown, Aaron Stronzck, Gloria V. Langston and others
Plaintiff: Eduardo Deleon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tull #294591 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01756
Petitioner: Conrad Anthony Tull
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan F Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv06766
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
McQuiston v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01162
Defendant: United States of America
Petitioner: Dale Conrad McQuiston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Conrad Starks v. United States
as 24-2631
Respondent: United States of America
Movant: Conrad Starks
David Conrad v. USA
as 24-2330
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Applicant: DAVID CONRAD
Renfro et al v. Conrad et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Defendant: Thomas Conrad, (F/N/U) Burton, (F/N/U) Andrews and others
Plaintiff: Darrell Wallace, Khadree Renfro and Vaughn Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conrad v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11664
Plaintiff: Melissa Conrad
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?