Cases 21 - 30 of 10,902
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Robbins v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins, SR
Defendant:
Sue Jones, Nurse, Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dextraze v. Mondules
as 9:2024cv03406
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mondules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
as 24-6553
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL, ROY G. DAVIDSON and ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS
Defendant:
JA'BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer, A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer, SGT. JANE DOE DOWNEY and others
Murphy v. County of Chemung
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY, JR., -
Defendant:
WILLIAM WASHBURN, COUNTY OF CHEMUNG, CITY OF ELMIRA and others
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv04993
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster, Correctional Officer M. McNeal, Correctional Officer M. Michael Lemone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Yates
as 1:2024cv01627
Plaintiff:
John Green Hill
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin v. Prine
as 6:2024cv06350
Plaintiff:
Casey Joel McLaughlin, Sr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Nicole Prine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
