Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Wodarski v. Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky et al
as 2:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Wodarski
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center Kentucky and Deputy Lindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01151
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Allen Mulkey and Dana Lee
Plaintiff:
Quentin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eiland v. Russell County District Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Dist. Court, Heath Taylor, The Russell Commission of Russell County Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Eiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
HECHING et al v.ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01659
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HECHING , JOSEPH WERFEL , AVRAHAM NEFOUSSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Cantrell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02151
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Cantrell
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HECHING et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2017cv01192
Plaintiff:
NORMAN HECHING , JOSEPH WERFEL , AVRAHAM NEFOUSSI and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Dana Andrews v. Howard Forman, et al
as 17-10766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA LEE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD C. FORMAN, Clerk of Court, Clerk's Office, SCOTT ISREAL, Sheriff, Broward County Sheriff's Office and DEAN REGISTER, Director of F.D.L.E.
Lee v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2016cv12597
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
