Cases 21 - 30 of 868
David E. Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02681
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith and Sigrid Smith
Defendant:
American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
SILVIA JOYCE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Alexander, Kimberbly Brock, Kimberly Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Coleman v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11132
Plaintiff:
Sharan Coleman
Defendant:
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., James C. Foster, David R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Smith v. Cartagena et al
as 1:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
David W. Smith, II
Defendant:
Joseph A. Cartagena, Curtis J Jackson, III, Reminisce Smith Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
HEPHZIBAH v. PHILLIPS et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH
Defendant:
JOHN PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH WARREN, TRACI E ABRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN LUX RESEARCH et al v. HULL MCGUIRE PC et al
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
IN LUX RESEARCH and LINDSAY OLSON
Defendant:
HULL MCGUIRE PC, JOHN DANIEL HULL, DAVID B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
JOHNSON v. DAVID D. SMITH PLLC
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
SILVIA JOYCE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID D. SMITH PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
