Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Gluckman v. United States Department of Labor
as 3:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
David Elliott Gluckman
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Elliott v. Google Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv01072
Plaintiff:
David Elliott
Defendant:
Google Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Elliott v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02575
Plaintiff:
David Elliott
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
USA v. David Burney
as 11-10670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ELLIOTT BURNEY
RFI Energy, Inc., et al v. Director OWCP, et al
as 10-4068
Petitioner:
RFI ENERGY, INC. and STATE WORKERS INSURANCE FUND
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OWCP and DAVID ELLIOTT
Rodriguez v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2010cv02022
Plaintiff:
Frank Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Scranton, Scranton Police Department, Dina Albanesi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kistler v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2010cv00466
Plaintiff:
John M Kistler, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Dougherty, Robert Russell, David Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Elliott, et al v. Verizon Connected Solutions, I, et al
as 09-4024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ELLIOTT
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDGARDO RIVERA, JOSE LOPEZ, FRANK HOUCK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON CONNECTED SOLUTIONS, INC., INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and VERIZON NJ INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HOUSTON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04691
Plaintiff:
TUNG HOUSTON, YVONNE ADAMS, CELIA AGUILAR and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
