Cases 21 - 30 of 1,074
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
MORRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, LAURA ALI, the New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and JOSE ARANGO
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Appellant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, LAURA ALI, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN CHAIRS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
FULOP FOR GOVERNOR, ELECTION LAW CLINIC AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
Greiner v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Greiner
Defendant:
Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, Anti-War Committee and Students for a Democratic Society at UIC
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Tom Carney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, Anti-War Committee and Students for a Democratic Society at UIC
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Tom Carney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Republican National Committee et al v. Aguilar et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Nevada Republican Party and Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Francisco Aguilar, Lorena Portillo, Hoen Scott William and others
Intervenor:
Rise Action Fund, Institute for a Progressive Nevada and Nevada Alliance for Retired Americans
Amicus Curiae:
ACLU of Nevada and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20507 Administration of Voter Registration
Republican National Committee et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Jordan Jorritsma and Emerson Silvernail
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater
Intervenor:
Detroit Disability Power, Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans and League of Women Voters of Michigan
Petitioner:
Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cowles v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Cowles, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Oregon Democratic Party
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party, Corp
Defendant:
Oregon Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
