Cases 21 - 30 of 68,893
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gwendolyn Hall v. California Victim of Crime Compensation Board et al
as 2:2024cv04652
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
California Victim of Crime Compensation Board, The Pasadena Fire Chief Chad Augustin, Lindsey Reed Director of the Woman Room and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
