Cases 21 - 30 of 59
In Re: Cheerios Marketing
as 12-3943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELSA ACEVEDO, EDWARD MYERS and CLAIRE M. THEODORE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOBIN CHOI, CHARITY HUEY and JEFFERY STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MILLS, INC, a Delaware Corporation
Myers v. Palmer et al
as 3:2011cv00464
Petitioner:
Edward Myers
Defendant:
Darla Palmer , Bryan Buckley and Rebecca Mansell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Myers v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 11-13034
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM EDWARD MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN
Myers v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2011cv00181
Petitioner:
William Edward Myers
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Myers v. Palmer et al
as 3:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Edward Myers
Defendant:
Darla Palmer , Bryan Buckley and Rebecca Mansell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. Norman
as 4:2011cv00065
Petitioner:
George Edward Myers
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCorkle v. Paterson
as 10-1870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cyrus McCorkle, Melvin Williams, Marc Lewis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly Speaker, Dean Skelos, New York State Majority Speaker, Judith Kaye, Chief Judge and others
Myer v. Easterling Correctional Facility Health Care Service Provider (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Myer
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility Health Care Service Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv01884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McCorkle v. Paterson
as 10-213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cyrus McCorkle, Melvin Williams, Marc Lewis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Paterson, New York State Governor, Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly Speaker, Dean Skelos, New York State Majority Speaker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
