Cases 21 - 30 of 63
John Frilando v. Director Timothy Johnson
as 14-7492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY FRILANDO, a/k/a John Frilando, a/k/a John A. Frilando
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Acting Warden, ASSOCIATE WARDEN LANKFORD, UNIT MANAGER R. KEYS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Hill et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2011cv00799
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M. Hill, Joseph M. Hill, Sr. and Sandra F. Hill
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Texas Instruments Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Hill et al
as 3:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Hill , Kenneth W. Hill, Jr., Gerald C. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wanda F. Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07427
Petitioner:
WILLIE F. HILL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DANIEL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frilando v. Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv02931
Plaintiff:
John A Frilando
Defendant:
Timothy Johnson, Warden Lankford, R Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springs v. Graham et al
as 3:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Springs
Defendant:
John Doe Graham, Donnetta Robinson, John Doe Lesley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Willie Hill
as 13-2926
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIE F. HILL
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv02964
Petitioner:
WILLIE F. HILL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DAINEL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
