Cases 21 - 30 of 223
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv01457
Defendant:
The City of Bryan, Melvin Ford, Jr and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Ford Jr v. The City of Bryan, Texas
as 4:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ford Jr and Melvin Daniel Ford, Jr
Defendant:
The City of Bryan, Texas, St. Joseph Hospital, Lee Saunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ford v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Ford, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
FORD v. USA
as 1:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE FORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davidson et al v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
Haylee Rose Davidson and Eric Davidson
Defendant:
William Ford, Jr. and Cedar Avenue LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
FORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21952
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON FORD, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ford, Jr. v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03734
Plaintiff:
Larry Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
FORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12621
Plaintiff:
ALEX FORD and ALEX FORD, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bozant et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02478
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bozant, Quincy Cormier, Gary Eller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
