Cases 21 - 30 of 392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bozeman v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Bozeman
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter #6469, Frito-Lay Sales, Inc. and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Stringer v. Frito-Lay Corporation
as 22-60518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Lavel Stringer
Defendant / Appellee:
Frito-Lay Corporation, Kroger Food Corporation and Pepsi Corporation, A Parent Company to Frito-Lay
Montgomery v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 7:2022cv06982
Plaintiff:
Starr Montgomery
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc, Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, L.P. and FL Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
January Crews-Sanchez v. Frito Lay, Inc.
as 22-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANUARY CREWS-SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FRITO LAY, INCORPORATED
Clark v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Gary Clark
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
