Cases 21 - 30 of 2,443
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldstein v. Simon
as 1:2024cv20633
Petitioner:
Brooke Goldstein
Respondent:
Matthew Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Annis et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Leslie Annis and Milton Goldstein
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT v. STEVE GOLDSTEIN
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
STEVE GOLDSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldstein v. Essential Demo, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10248
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant:
Essential Demo, Inc. and Rise Construction Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Nathan P. Goldstein v. Advanced Scaffold Services North Atlantic, LLC
as 1:2024cv10203
Plaintiff:
Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant:
Advanced Scaffold Services North Atlantic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
