Cases 21 - 30 of 19,777
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Onwuameze
as 3:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
Obiora Onwuameze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slavin v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv04742
Plaintiff:
Edward Slavin
Defendant:
Latoya Ja'Nae Hughes, James Keller and Jennifer Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sorita Elzey
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Chris Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Ryan Hughes, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Hughes v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hughes
Defendant:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
