Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Kenneth Alston v. Eddie Buffaloe, Jr.
as 26-6856
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EUGENE ALSTON
Defendant:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., TODD E. ISHEE, TIMOTHY D. MOOSE and others
Orr v. State of New York
as 26-2089
Petitioner:
ALANA MARIE ORR, on behalf of her minor child, O.O.
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW YORK, ANTHONY T. MCGINTY, Judge of the NY Ulster County Family Court, KERI SAVONA, Judge of the NY Ulster County Family Court and others
Doe v. Gadsen et al
as 9:2026cv80900
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Juan Poole, II
Defendant:
Antonio Gadsen, Latefonie Poole, Stephanie Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Frankel v. Ingram et al
as 1:2026cv13381
Plaintiff:
Stephen Frankel
Defendant:
Douglas S. Ingram, Ian M. Estepan, Louise R. Rodino-Klapac and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 5:2026cv01862
Plaintiff:
Whitney A Ingram
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Reid (Trent)
as 26-1998
Defendant:
DESHAWN THOMAS, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2026cv01563
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. INGRAM, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CENTURION HEALTH, DAN MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulsey v. Moates et al
as 4:2026cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hulsey
Defendant:
Sheriff Johnny Moates, Amy Ingram and Tommy Moates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White v. Ingram
as 2:2026cv01258
Plaintiff:
Leon Lion I Eugene White, Jr
Defendant:
Officer F Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
