Cases 21 - 30 of 4,050
Wilson v. Irving
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Wilson
Respondent:
Sheriff Antionette Irving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kolta v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03804
Defendant:
Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kolta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nemeth v. New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Campus
as 1:2024cv04762
Plaintiff:
Margaret Nemeth
Defendant:
New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Campus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03451
Defendant:
Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rose v. Pina et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Kieron Carlson, Shuree Jemmett, Alejandro Pina and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irving Randall Brown, Jr. v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04736
Plaintiff:
Irving Randall Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00937
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Briones et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Ariadna Rossell Urbina, Darwin Araely Garcia Trigeros, Deceased, J. I. G. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
