Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Waller v. USA
as 1:2018cv00158
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Clay Waller, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLAY v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
ALFARUS JAMES CLAY
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, BROCK, HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown , Michael Russell , Ernest Lewis and others
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CLAY v. DEPARTMENT OF OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
JAMES CLAY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY , OFFICE ATTORNEY GENERAL , DIVISION OF STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard v. Schilling et al
as 5:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Steven Maynard
Defendant:
Donald E. Schilling, Estate of Ruth C. Schilling, Donald Dean Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clay v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01451
Plaintiff:
James Clay
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandt et al v. Honnecke et al
as 1:2015cv02785
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Brandt and James Clay Walters
Defendant:
Von Honnecke , Chase Honnecke and S&H Heating, A/C, Sheetmetal Co.
Counter_claimant:
Chase Honnecke , Von Honnecke and S&H Heating, A/C, Sheetmetal Co.
Counter_defendant:
Steven Lee Brandt and James Clay Walters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Waller v. USA
as 1:2013cv00048
Petitioner:
James Clay Waller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
