Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Hairston v. Cooper et al
as 5:2018ct03311
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fields, K. Graves, Monica Bond and others
Plaintiff:
James Terry Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Terry v. J. Shartle
as 18-15280
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES TERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petrie et al v. Florida Tropical Plumbing Corporation
as 0:2017cv62545
Plaintiff:
Joseph Petrie , James Terry , Larry Puccio and others
Defendant:
Florida Tropical Plumbing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
James Terry v. USDC-AZT
as 17-72871
:
In re: JAMES TERRY
Petitioner:
JAMES TERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
ERIC MARKOVICH
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
John Doe, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrester et al v. Wood County et al
as 6:2017cv00561
Defendant:
Wood County , James A. Brown, Williams Miles Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
John Winston Forrester , John Philip Forrester , James Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Harris et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Terry Moon, Jr
Defendant:
Mr. Harris, Mr. Domini, Ms. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Millis et al
as 5:2017ct03210
Plaintiff:
James Terry Hairston
Defendant:
David Millis, Danielle Stuessel, Chris Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
