Cases 21 - 30 of 34
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Neyman v. Cherokee Electric Cooperative
as 4:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Hollis Neyman
Defendant:
Cherokee Electric Cooperative and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01265
Plaintiff:
John Hollis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sadaka Davis v. John Jackson, III
as 15-10268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SADAKA T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HOLLIS JACKSON, III
Childers v. Jackson (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Leslie Renee Childers
Defendant:
John Hollis Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jackson (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv01064
Plaintiff:
Sadaka T. Davis
Defendant:
John Hollis Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie, et al
as 2:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Echols
Defendant:
Sheriff of Bertie, Office of Sheriff of Bertie, Delegates of Sheriff of Bertie Involved and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SB Properties v. Hollis
as 1:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
SB Properties
Defendant:
John Hollis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Rivera (John Whaley)
as 13-2864
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Rivera, AKA Santos Morales, AKA Antonio Almadamo, AKA Santos Garcia, Jason Villaman, AKA Santi and Jasmin Rivera, AKA Jasmin Hernandez, AKA Rubi Rivera, AKA Rubi Hernandez
Defendant - Appellant:
John Whaley, AKA John Holly, AKA Johnny
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
