Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Reed v. Coakley
as 4:2013cv01480
Petitioner:
Jack Reed
Respondent:
J. Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Akaka et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Daniel Akaka, Lamar Alexander, Kelly Ayotte and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Larry Waites v. Lee County, Mississippi, et al
as 12-60236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J. WAITES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE COUNTY MISSISSIPPI, CITY OF TUPELO MISSISSIPPI, JACK REED, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Tupelo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Waites v. Lee County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Waites
Defendant:
Lee County, Mississippi, City of Tupelo, Mississippi, Ed Neely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
