Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Leon v. Janet Dunlop, et al
as 13-17650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LEON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET R. DUNLOP, WILLIAM A. DORSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
United States v. James Curti
as 13-2085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James S. Curtis
Bernstein et al v. Dunlop et al
as 3:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
John L. Bernstein, Mary Helen Bernstein, Michael A. Leon and others
Defendant:
Janet Dunlop, William A. Dorsey, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Curtis v. Riley et al
as 3:2012cv05629
Plaintiff:
James Edward Curtis
Defendant:
William E Riley and Clark Lee Stuhr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Curtis v. Harold Clarke
as 12-7170
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. CURTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Curtis v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Edwin Curtis
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department, AMR Service and Jackson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez Vasquez v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv05298
Plaintiff:
Juan J Gomez Vasquez
Defendant:
State of Washington, Pierce County Jail, Tacoma Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Veeramachaneni et al
as 9:2011cv81199
Plaintiff:
James T. Curtis
Defendant:
Mamatha Veeramachaneni, Ms. Boldin and Nancy Finisse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
