Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bishop v. Ramirez
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Park V Bishop, Jr.
Defendant:
John Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aliferis et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022at00073
Plaintiff:
Alexander Aliferis, Kristy Carlson, Rebecca DeValle and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Department of Public Health of the State of California, Director Tomas Aragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aliferis et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Alexander Aliferis, Kristy Carlson, Rebecca DeValle and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Department of Public Health of the State of California, Tomas Aragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant:
VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
RAMIREZ-PRADO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02601
Petitioner:
JOHN RAMIREZ-PRADO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
