Cases 21 - 30 of 384
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watts, David v. Jones, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
David W. Watts
Defendant:
Det. Kevin Jones, Det. Mark Smith, Jacob Cirian and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
James L. Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Sheriff Deputy Zachary Cuonzo-Simmons, Sheriff Deputy Brandon Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia, Richard Roundtree, Deputy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Bowers
as 22-11096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Bowers, Mr., Senior Warden, J. Rodriguez, Ms., Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02758
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones and Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, J Rodriguez, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
