Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Brenda Hamilton, et al v. Louis Roberts, III, et al
as 17-10521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA HAMILTON, JAMES HAMILTON and DENNIS LARAMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS ROBERTS, III, In his official capacity as sheriff Jackson County Florida and STEPHEN SMITH, In his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2015cv80266
Plaintiff:
Jason Louis Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Dwight Tipton v. Louis Roberts, III, et al
as 14-13716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT E. TIPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS ROBERTS, III, In his official capacity as Sheriff of Jackson County Florida,, JAMES LAWRENCE, In his individual capacity,, KIMBERLY MUNDY, In her individual capacity, and others
Munoz v. Russo Battista, P.L. et al
as 0:2014cv60613
Plaintiff:
Mayra Santana Munoz
Defendant:
Russo Battista, P.L. , Anthony J. Russo, Jr., P.A. , Anthony John Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pisano v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv30269
Plaintiff:
Louis Robert Pisano
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SOLIS v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
JOHN LOUIS ROBERTS, MARA SCANLON ROBERTS and STERLING PRINTING AND GRAPHICS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ROBERTS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79124
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ROBERTS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00252
Petitioner:
Joe Louis Roberts
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
