Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Cassell et al v. Vanderbilt University et al
as 3:2016cv02086
Plaintiff:
Loren L. Cassell , Pamela M. Steele , John E. Rice and others
Defendant:
Vanderbilt University , Vanderbilt Retirement Plan Oversight Committee , Donald Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Steele et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Steele and Jerome Royster
Defendant:
Charlotte Jenkins, Parks, Cathy Pummill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Holbrook
as 3:2015cv05873
Petitioner:
Andrew M Steele
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steele v. Jenkins
as 1:2015cv01374
Petitioner:
Charles M. Steele
Respondent:
Charlette Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steele v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02593
Petitioner:
Charles M. Steele
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Steele v. Gary Morh, et al
as 15-3474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES M. STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MORH, DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIONS AND CORRECTIONS, CHARLOTTE JENNINGS and others
Steele et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05273
Plaintiff:
Gayle M. Steele and Larry N. Steele
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 4:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Steele
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Steele v. Morh et al
as 2:2014cv02017
Plaintiff:
Charles M Steele
Defendant:
Gary Morh, The Department of Rehabilitations andCorrections, C. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
