Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Hofer v. Spencer et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Hofer
Defendant:
Brett M. Spencer, C. David Kelly, Kristopher Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAUPIN et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2017cv01213
Defendant:
ASIF SHAWKAT, BASHAR AL-ASAD, SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. SPENCER, KENT M. MAUPIN and LEE ANN COTTRELL
Special Master:
ALAN BALARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10980
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer et al v. American Red Cross et al
as 6:2017cv00459
Defendant:
American Red Cross of the Mohawk Valley, Mary Doe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Spencer and Patricia M. Spencer
Not Classified By Court:
James Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPENCER et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SCOTT D SPENCER and TINA M SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Spencer v. Dunn
as 2:2016cv01877
Petitioner:
Kerry M Spencer
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Pumphrey v. Joe Coakley
as 16-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE COAKLEY, O. OFFICER GIBSON, J. D. JAMES and others
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Allen v. Bamboo HR
as 2:2016cv00905
Plaintiff:
M. Spencer McAllis Allen
Defendant:
Bamboo HR
Counter_claimant:
Bamboo HR
Counter_defendant:
M. Spencer McAllis Allen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
