Cases 21 - 30 of 2,092
Laing v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv06545
Defendant:
County of Monroe, David M. Smith, Hon. Judge Vincent Dinolfo and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Laing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lisa Smith v. Matthew Jennings
as 24-1877
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. JENNINGS, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the County of Roanoke, Virginia and ROANOKE COUNTY, Virginia
Plaintiff:
LISA M. SMITH, individually and in her capacity as Executrix and Personal Representative of the Estate of Shawn A. Smith (deceased)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BEAUVAIS et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. BEAUVAIS, ROBERT L. BREWIS, CONNIE F. FRAZIER BREWIS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Antonio Smith v. Scott Eckstein, et al
as 24-2483
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, JOHN KIND, SCOTT ECKSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO M. SMITH
Smith et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M Smith and Ronald J Smith
Defendant:
WRIGHT NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Fain v. Patrick County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
William David Fain
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Sgt. Emily Celozzi, Sara Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kena Moore, et al v. Humana, Inc., et al
as 24-5589
Plaintiff:
RUSSEL A. HOHMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SUSAN M. SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KENA MOORE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
HUMANA RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE and HUMANA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
