Cases 21 - 30 of 61,178
Fine v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Paul Fine, Jr.
Defendant:
Dougherty, Grimaldi, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barys v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barys
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, et al
as 1:2024cv04127
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fisher o/b/o A.L.M., a minor, o/b/o Edwin Maldonado, deceased, and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Jennifer N Allen
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Strine v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Strine
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Teat v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
William Aaron Teat, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thinn v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Montoya Thinn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FKA Distributing Co v. Highflyer214 et al
as 2:2024cv11320
Plaintiff:
FKA Distributing Co Doing business as Homedics
Defendant:
Highflyer214, BRIX Fulfilment Center and Martin Eisikovic
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
