Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 121
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Defendant: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner: Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Respondent: Bureau of Land Management Director
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04794
Plaintiff: TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, PHILADELPHIA CITY COUNCIL, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner: State of Wyoming
Respondent: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Consolidated Petitioner: Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16673
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07220
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nathaniel Turner v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 22-2321
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant / Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and MICHAEL GARVEY, Deputy Managing Director of Office of Forensic Science
Kaplan v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
as 22-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant: Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant: Bank Saderat Iran, Central Bank Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran, AKA Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bank Saderat PLC, Attn: Dr. Hamid Borhani, Managing Director, Bank Saderat 6 Lothbury London EC2R 7HD UK
Vierbuchen v. United States of America President et al
as 0:2022cv00001
Defendant: United States of America President, United States Office of Personnel Management Director, General Services Administration Administrator and others
Plaintiff: Margaret M Vierbuchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arcamone-Makinano et al v. United States Department of the Interior Secretary et al
as 0:2021cv00196
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior Secretary, United States Bureau of Land Management Director, Deborah Halaand and others
Plaintiff: Amelia Arcamone-Makinano, Bonifacio Makinano and Pauline St. Denis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?