Cases 21 - 30 of 116
BROWN v. MOATS et al
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, DR. TRUEBLOOD, MARK D. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DEAN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. River Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv13234
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
City of River Rouge, Craig Waple, Amjad Issa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks #153447 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Preston Purnell #526991, Kentreze White #799568, Dreshawn Dawon Harris #415940 and others
Defendant:
Unknown Gierke, Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett, et al v. City of Centreville, et al.
as 3:2020cv00530
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Bennett and Earlie Fuse
Defendant:
Dennis Traiteur, Jr., Lamar Gentry, Marius Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Carroll County, Kentucky, Capt. Forlizzi and John Proctor
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00020
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
John Proctor and Melissa Pohlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Carroll County, Kentucky
as 3:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
John Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Deputy Brian, Deputy Logan Hulsey and John Proctor
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Wilkie
as 20-1679
Claimant:
MARK C. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT L. WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, John Proctor and Melissa Pohlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
