Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Raymond Bradford v. M. Voong, et al
as 20-55216
Defendant:
BRANDON D. MERRITT, K. KHAMOOSHIAN, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VOONG, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Director of Office of Appeal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
SBFO Operator No. 3, LLC et al v. Onex Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv03271
Plaintiff:
HC Stores 2017, LLC, SBFO Operator No. 9-Wichita, LLC, SBFO Operator No. 4, LLC and others
Defendant:
Onex Partners IV, LP, Matthew Ross, Anthony Munk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jones v. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02076
Defendant:
Mark Layton, Arthur Amron, Arthur Smith and others
Nominal Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Jones v. Straehla et al
as 5:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Mark Layton, Mammoth Energy Services Inc, Arthur Amron and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armenta v. Goodyear, City of et al
as 2:2019cv05186
Defendant:
Unknown Ross, Matthew Ross, Goodyear, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Armenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shaer v. Straehla et al
as 1:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Paul V. Heerwagen IV, Mark Layton, Arthur Amron and others
Nominal Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Shaer
Randall v. Straehla et al
as 1:2019cv01682
Defendant:
Paul V. Heerwagen IV, Mark Layton, Arthur Amron and others
Nominal Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aaron Randall
Kuhar v. Straehla et al
as 5:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Mark Layton, Mammoth Energy Services Inc, Arthur Amron and others
Plaintiff:
Bryce Kuhar
Galloway v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2019cv05026
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, Assistant District Attorney Robert Schalk, Assistant District Attorney Joseph LaRocca and others
Plaintiff:
Josiah Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
