Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Moussa Diarra v. Melody Maddox, et al
as 21-12660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODY M. MADDOX, Sheriff, R. AKLES, MEDICAL, MENTAL, DENTAL DIRECTOR, DOCTOR and others
Gibbs v. Ames et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Antwyn Gibbs
Defendant:
Warden Donald Ames, COI Reid, COII Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Pattman et al
as 1:2019cv03533
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Brandi Lathan, Officer Cummings, Warden Micheal Stephan and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. San Diego, CA Sheriff et al
as 3:2019cv02022
Defendant:
Deputy Storrs, Deputy Ponce, Deputy Abas and others
Plaintiff:
Erica D. Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gibson v. Mental Health Doctor et al
as 7:2019cv00579
Defendant:
3 grizzl, D. L. Whited, Joe Melones and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Wayne Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Wenzke v. Paola Munoz, et al
as 19-2758
Defendant / Appellee:
MENTAL HEALTH DOCTOR MOSES, CONNECTIONS INC, In their Official Capacity, MENTAL HEALTH DOCTOR SUSAN MUMFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM WENZKE
Wenzke v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Adam Wenzke
Defendant:
Metzger, Paola Munoz, Mental Health Doctor Susan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Mental Health Doctors
as 3:2017cv02367
Plaintiff:
Fred A Dixon, Jr
Defendant:
Mental Health Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 17-3636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, Chief, Bureau of Classification, MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden, W.C.I., JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager and others
Phinezy v. Cook et al
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Rodney Phinezy
Defendant:
Jail Commander Cook and Mental Health Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
