Cases 21 - 30 of 52
CARR v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT CARR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOJTOWICZ v. MILLER et al
as 2:2016cv05029
Plaintiff:
JOYCE WOJTOWICZ
Defendant:
RICHARD MILLER, MICHAEL A. CARR, KENNETH E. BRUMBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Michael Carr, et al v. Air Line Pilots Assn, Intl
as 16-20578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. CARR, GREGORY KATHAN, PERRY MEIER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Pacific Western Bank v. Tri-State Imaging Partners et al
as 2:2016cv00850
Plaintiff:
Pacific Western Bank
Defendant:
Tri-State Imaging Partners, Tri-State Imaging PA Holdings, Jay S. Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross v. Ziolkowski et al
as 3:2016cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ali L Cross
Defendant:
Christoper Ziolkowski, Michael C Carr and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03222
Plaintiff:
Dondi R. Carr and Michael L. Carr
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as DE/1:15-cv-01024
Plaintiff:
Justin Acosta , Travis Adams , Leon J. Alexander and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC , KBR, Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. and others
Carr v. Thaler et al
as 6:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Michael E Carr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Kelvin Scott, Stuart Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carr et al v. Air Line Pilots Association International
as 4:2014cv00451
Defendant:
Air Line Pilots Association International
Plaintiff:
Michael A Carr , Gregory Kathan , Perry Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
