Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Wilson v. Kelley et al
as 1:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Kelley, Dale Santerelli and W.C.A.D.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kelley v. Liebherr-America, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01661
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Defendant:
Liebherr-America, Inc. doing business as Liebherr USA Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. WARD
as 2:2021cv00269
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL KELLEY
Respondent:
Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLEY v. WARD
as 4:2021cv00211
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL KELLEY
Respondent:
TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Morning Bee, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08420
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Defendant:
Morning Bee, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56972
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan et al v. County of Imperial et al
as 3:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Jan Ayala, Jesus Escobar, Uriel Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ryan and Gilda Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
KELLEY v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2021cv11120
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17822
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
