Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Romero #231853 v. Corizon et al
as 2:2019cv01908
Defendant:
Corizon, C Demery and Maureen Gay
Plaintiff:
Davis Michael Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcon et al v. Dalglish7 Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06956
Plaintiff:
Amalia Cortes, Maria Villa Balbuena, Jose Manuel Balcon and others
Defendant:
Brian McLaughlin, Michael Romero and Dalglish7 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz et al v. Linde Gas North America LLC
as 4:2018cv02308
Plaintiff:
Adolfo DIAZ, Michael Romero and Felix Garza
Defendant:
Linde Gas North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis Romero v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-16763
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVIS MICHAEL ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
ROMERO v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05070
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROMERO
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Graham v. Teller County, Colorado, et al
as 15-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TELLER COUNTY, COLORADO, MIKE ENSMINGER, individually and in his official capacity as Teller County Sheriff, MICHAEL ROMERO, individually and in his official capacity as detective, Teller County and others
Graham v. Teller County, Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv03059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Graham
Defendant:
Teller County, Colorado, Mike (I) Ensminger , Mike Ensminger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01715
Petitioner:
Davis Michael Romero
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
