Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Johnson #098105 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson #098105
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, John Cherry, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Francis et al
as 3:2012cv02880
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Livingston, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy Cornelia Francis, Barack Hussein Obama, Jennifer Mulhern Granholm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Best v. Cox
as 5:2012ct03187
Plaintiff:
Derrick Raymont Best
Defendant:
Mike Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Rath et al
as 1:2012cv00836
Petitioner:
Berry Miller
Respondent:
Phil Rath, Mike Cox, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronely Chambers v. State of Michigan, et al
as 12-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONELY DESHON CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Edward Carlton v. Jennifer Granholm, et al
as 12-1041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD NATHANIEL CARLTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER GRANHOLM, former Governor, FREDERIDCK PYTALL, Canton Township Police Department, BOOTH, Sergeant, Wayne County Sheriff Department and others
Carlton v. Granholm et al
as 2:2011cv15621
Plaintiff:
Edward Carlton
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Frederick Pytall, Booth and others
Davis v. Cox et al
as 4:2011cv13818
Plaintiff:
Ernest Davis
Defendant:
Mike Cox, Patricia Caruso, Norma Killough and others
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al
as 11-20216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C. and others
Raimondo v. Hood et al
as 2:2010cv15107
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raimondo
Defendant:
Denise Page Hood, United States of America, National Congressional Black Caucus and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
