Cases 21 - 30 of 105
(PC) King v. Vera
as 2:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Larry Louis King
Defendant:
N. J. Vera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. Union County et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Pastor E. Guerrero
Defendant:
Union County, Union County Sheriff's Office, Union County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cara Jones, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 21-16281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARA JONES, as parent and guardian of E.J.,N.J.,A.J.,and L.J., Minors, JUSTIN EFROS, as parent and guardian of J.A.E.,. and J.R.E., Minors, NICHOLE HUBBARD, plas parent and guardian of C.H., a minor; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE, LLC, MATTEL, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Chicas-Najarro v. Garland
as 21-6377
Petitioner:
GLADYS CHICAS-NAJARRO and N. N. J-C
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. N & J Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Defendant:
N & J Logistics, Inc., Luis Garcia, Prime Holdings Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 21-1783
Respondent:
J. JONES, JOHN E. WETZEL, D. CLOSE and others
Petitioner:
In re: LAVOND HILL
HAYES v. BISHOP et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
N J Howell, T Bishop, K Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044
HAYES v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2021cv00024
Defendant:
N J HOWELL, T BISHOP and K OWENS
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HAYES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
BOBBI J. SALAMON, HUNT, PROBURSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.