Cases 21 - 30 of 191
Angel Navarette v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv06433
Plaintiff:
Angel Navarette
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salazar v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv02237
Plaintiff:
Gary Salazar
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Tillman, Trancoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rifenbury v. Pinal County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Rifenbury
Defendant:
Pinal County Sheriff's Department, Julian Navarrette, Unknown Navarette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
US v. Antonio Navarette
as 22-6136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO MARCIAL NAVARETTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Navarette et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Marlenne Navarette and Victor Mercado Reyes
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reiner v. Navarette et al
as 3:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark Reiner and Martin Reiner
Defendant:
Jorge Navarette, Tom Zhang, Tani Cantil-Sakauye and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Samuel R. Navarette, Jr. et al v. County of San Barnardino et al
as 5:2021cv02022
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Navarette, Jr., Samuel R. Navarette, Sr., Andrew Navarette and others
Defendant:
County of San Barnardino, City of Victorville and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
