Cases 21 - 30 of 361
Edwards v. Grange Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01095
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Plaintiff:
Norvel C Edwards, II
Defendant:
Grange Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
NORVELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11513
Plaintiff:
WESLEY NORVELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deaton et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
John Deaton and Deaton Law Firm
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Johnson Law Firm, Blake Norvell and others
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Rafati v. Fort Bend County Texas et al
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Attorney Haroon Rafati
Defendant:
Fort Bend County Texas, Sheriff Eric Fagan, Gregory Markovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Adams
as 23-10227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cristin Jheri Adams, also known as Cristin Jheri Hogeland, also known as Cristin Jheri Norvell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crump v. United States Probation Offices et al
as 1:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
Norvell Crump and Norvell Webster Crump
Respondent:
United States Probation Offices, United States District Court- District of Colorado and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartley v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Bartley
Defendant:
Adam Collins, Lieutenant Horn, Sergeant Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
