Cases 21 - 30 of 4,233
Hill v. Vaughey et al
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hill
Defendant:
John Vaughey, Jack Truppo Burbage, John Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eisen et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Phil Eisen and Randall McGee
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mills v. May
as 5:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stalker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stalker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Chad Jennings and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sierra v. Tomino LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02795
Plaintiff:
Sierra Ormandy
Defendant:
Tomino LLC, Tomino Taberna Gallega, Victor Gonzalez and others
Gottorff (PS) v. People of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
David J. Gottorff
Defendant:
People of Colorado, The, Phil Weiser, State of Colorado, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katie Sczesny, et al v. Philip Murphy, et al
as 24-1676
Plaintiff:
KATIE SCZESNY, JAIME RUMFIELD, DEBRA HAGEN and others
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, in his official and personal capacity and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
