Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Jackson v. Martinez et al
as 1:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
H. Martinez, R. Luna, J. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Hatten v. D. Young, et al
as 11-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D YOUNG, W. ZEGARSKI, J. ADIMI and others
Timothy Hatten v. J. Micieli, et al
as 11-30349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICIELI, D. MANDOLFO, J P YOUNG and others
Roberts-Bey v. Lawson et al
as 9:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Leon Roberts-Bey
Defendant:
Cheryl Lawson, Linda S Martin, Scott A Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. Barker et al
as 1:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
A. Barker, R. Andert, J. C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatten v. Lafargue et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
Carl Lafargue, J P Young, J Michieli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatten v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv02660
Defendant:
D. Young, W. Zegarski, J. Adimi and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Hatten v. J. Micieli, et al
as 10-31228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICIELI, D. MANDOLFO, J P YOUNG and others
United States of America v. R Luna Produce
as 4:2010cv04904
Defendant:
R. Luna Produce Inc and Gustavo Luna
Plaintiff:
United States of America, USDA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Brenda Shaw, et al v. Phil Hardberger, et al
as 10-50443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA SHAW, Individually and as Next Friend to C.M., a Minor and LAKISHA MCCALISTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Mayor, City of San Antonio, in his Official Capacity, City of San Antonio, K. ALLEN, SAPD Officer, Individually and in Official Capacity, R LUNA, SAPD Officer, Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
