Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Young v. Stolle et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Deputy Brown, Sheriff Ken Stolle and R. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Daniel Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kofa v. Marshall et al
as 2:2020cv03038
Defendant:
Chartmans, LLC d/b/a Chartmans, Inc., Bradley R. Marshall and Cynthia Marshall
Plaintiff:
Elaine Kofa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. Ninth Circuit Solicitor's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02993
Defendant:
Benjamin Chad Simpson, John Does 1 - 10, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12267
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON R. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00665
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Maurice R. Marshall
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jackson v. Elmer et al
as 6:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Sue Torrez, Unknown Purvis, Norris Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Eunicholas E Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64006
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON R MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akpeneye v. US
as 20-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. CUMMINGS, CHARLES DELUGO, KEVIN TINDAL, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALLEN and SALI ALPHAEK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Marshall et al v. National Bank of Middlebury
as 5:2019cv00246
Defendant:
National Bank of Middlebury
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Marshall and Jeanine Weir
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Marshall v. Swift Transportation Services LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02984
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Services LLC and Novella Webb
Plaintiff:
Ariel R Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
